NewStats: 3,263,994 , 8,182,194 topics. Date: Monday, 09 June 2025 at 08:26 AM a2z1n

Is there no outlet where xiaomi phones are sold in Lagos aside online stores.

can I only buy this phone online. are there any stores/shop that sell?

tuasefemi:
Hello guys, I got my redmi note 7 4G/64G at slot on Tuesday for N66, and I can testify that the device issa bomb, with the specs and the smoothness, coupled with the size and shape. But I have an issue with my radio not working with Bluetooth. Anytime the Bluetooth is on, the radio doesn't work with speaker, except with earpiece, thereby, not working with external Bluetooth speaker devices.
Does anyone notice this, and what could be the solution?
Thanks!

any luck yet ?

or just call Sir.

07034350618. please sir send a text on whatsapp.

Even his 2019 ambition is based on revenge vendetta. Blood thirsty excuse for a cannibal. Can't believe this what some people are packaging and repackaging as President


There was a country

In Lagos for instance, we all know it's tinubu agberos that would snatch... perhaps the masses might be the one to die. The voters would not be able to stay and defend their votes that's the plan for this rubbish. Just watch as APC miscreants come in here and spew their trash

The other sunnah practice they ignore but they tend to follow what was abandoned

# Why would a sensible Muslim follow the hadith of a character (Abu Hurairah) who was highly suspected, accused and caught of lying? Is that verse of Quran not enough when Allah says He will most certainly fill hell with Satan and those that follow him?

# Whether Allah has a literal leg or metaphoric leg, whether His alleged leg is like human or not, why would He put his leg/foot into hell to fill it?

e

w

q

v. .

qs

uu

u

y

dd

f

4

qe

q

.

Ere..
I hope this is the right thread albaqir

Awon olodo jatijati


Pls re-read those hadith with sense. Stop being myopic.


Also, please you haven't listed all sahih hadith on this issue.

Just Incase, this issue has been treated some times in the past. All these selective s ba sef.

And Allah knows best.

Jumuah Mubarak

tintingz:


While possibility of a first cause is necessary, we don't know what it is, hence I've no reason to believe one exist until it's proven.

tintingz:


Yeah, we can't explain self existing God because it's imaginary and only exist in your head.

Continue contradicting yourself uncle

tintingz:


Like I said, this world is not PERFECT to have a PERFECT BEING.

on humans, the scriptures depends on humans to be true.

This is kind of argument from ignorance.

I think I'm done here.

tintingz:
First of all we don't know if the universe has a beginning or infinite, the idea that there must be something outside time and space is base on assumptions and flawed, nothing exist outside time and space, there's no outside as we can observe.

Cause and effect is not false, what I'm saying is we can't yet apply it to what cause the universe since we don't fully understand the universe if it has a beginning or infinite, it's unknown to us.

By yourself, you are already proving the existence of God.

When early men saw lightning and heard thunder, science(atheist) said they then gave it a name. god of thunder and lightning. i.e, man limited research and his inadequate tools for observation and investigation made him call the unknown a god.

What your lot didn't understand about man was this. The early men were not into the god of thunder or lightning or god of stone or god of leprosy. Man was only reaching out. Be it one god or 2 gods or 3 gods or 100 gods, man has always been reaching out. Even till today, man through science knowing or unknowingly, either by submission or compulsion has been reaching out. Through your advancements, you are only reaching out.

The in-it in you and me that makes us think about beginning or end or infinite or eternity is what makes that entity self existing

tintingz:
- Perfect : make (something) completely free from faults or defects; make as good as possible.

- Intelligent : the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.

So what's your point?

My point...Lol. Nothing.

The moment you understand that your definition of "perfection" or "intelligence" only defines what men has ascribed to a certain observable quantity, the moment you understand the concept of a self existing entity.

For instance, a class of 20 students engaged in a school examination. The 1st position according to your definition is for the perfect and intelligent student. While the 20th position is for the "imperfect" and "not" intelligent student. Or let me use this to broaden the scope. In any examination, 80%-100% is graded A. Any student who score like 100/100 is a "perfect" and "intelligent" student. Whereas 30%-0% is graded F, likewise a student getting less than 31 is regarded a failure.

Little do you understand that the grading is flawed cos the students generally are only tested based on what the school(system) has set as an examination be it practical or theory.

Where I'm going is this, you can't describe a self existing entity with such. It makes and limit it/him/her to your own reasoning(system) which truly is flawed since you can't exist on your own. That's the proof you are looking for. Please think.

It is your type that would argue good and evil. It is your type that would argue a "perfect born child" and an "im.becile" . It is your type that would argue wealth and poverty. It is your type that would argue that God is a racist.

Tintingz, you can't use a material concept to describe/judge/proportionate the immaterial

Brother, your reasoning is myopic.

I would end by saying this:

You dare deny the existence of a soul. Seriously. Lol. But you don't deny conscience or morality or humanism. Lol.

Your next question would be how does morality/humanism/conscience relate to soul or "what we are arguing here"

As I said before, I'm saying again, any question you ask or don't ask, whatever reaction you make/take proves the existence of a self existing being.

tintingz:


The universe is not perfect to have a perfect being, any attributes linked to a first cause will be full of assumptions which can be false. There's no sufficient evidence to existence of an intelligent design, I've no reason to believe one even exist.

Do you mind..

Define the words

1. "Perfect"

2. "Intelligent"

tintingz:
Have I not answer this or am I commenting in another thread?

Here's what I said.

Your "pride" is making you miss the point. Ain't saying you are proud o before you go berserk and emotionally defend yourself, but whatever reaction you give still prove the existence of a self existing entity.

tintingz:

The world is not perfect to assume a perfect entity. I don't have any Idea what a first cause should possess, I'm simply agnostic about it and I don't have any factual reason to believe one exist.

I want to ask you. Does a soul exist?

tintingz:
Even tho you made lots of assumptions, the bolded part is what Albaqir should take home with.

It seems you're now getting the main problems in this thread premises.

You are still missing the point brother. You are more intelligent than this. This is not a win or lose discourse. This is a let's reason together thread.

I believe albaqir would give a more better explanation than this.
Let me say:

Both infinite regress and the impossibility of infinite regress are true and false. None can be proved and at the same time disproved. But suffice me to use this, the soul and body of a man. We agree that the soul is not a part of the body but the body is under the control, and coverage of the soul which does not inhabit any particular part of the body. Thus it is both in the body as well as out of it. And therefore self existing on itself.

We therefore say quite logically that all existent things must end at an existence that exists by itself, because everything needs it for its existence. Hence the chain of existence must end with the cause of causes, which is self-existent.