NewStats: 3,265,417 , 8,186,682 topics. Date: Saturday, 14 June 2025 at 08:51 PM 6g1g6u

Since I came back from vacation I've created several threads that the B.O.T deleted but that's by the way.

Many people have told many people to have game, and some even go as far as teaching men how to game women. Of course, you must have come across the teachings one way or the other, prolly on Facebook, Twitter or any other media space. But what I always ask myself is, what is the end point of all these?

As a man, the fundamental question that should always ring in your head before you perform any action or inaction is; "what do I stand to gain from all these at the end of the day or what is in it for me?".

That's where the ' "why", "what" and "Is it compulsory" '? come in.

Why should I learn to game women ?
What is in it for me?
Is the reward compulsory?

The bottom line of gaming a woman is to get her to have sex with you. That's the basic truth.
The act of deceiving people for any other benefit is basically FRAUD.
So the point of gaming a woman is basically to get her to have sex with you.

Now ask yourself? Is having sex with that particular woman compulsory?
Is it worth the time you invest into gaming her?
Kids these days chase the wrong things. Nobody will give you an award of excellence for sleeping with many women .
There is no reward that comes with sleeping with multiple women.So, why should you use your precious limited time on earth learning how to get women to sleep with you?

The two most important thing in a man's life is purpose and respect. When you focus on your purpose, you become capable and when you are capable, people will respect you.

Imagine a man reading books on how to game women, when you can infact read books on self development.

Sex is not all that important for you to waste your time researching and studying how to get laid. There are many important things in life even more fulfilling than sex. A strong man is not moved my sex, he is purpose and event driven.

Since your legacy is not how much women you are able to bed, why focus on trying to bed many women?
Your 100% focus should be on your legacy.

Your children will not respect you because you've slept with many women, in fact they'll resent you for not being modest.

You will only earn the respect of your children by your legacy.

You don't even need to research how to game women. Sex should come to you naturally.
If you needed a form of teaching to get sex, it means you are not supposed to be having sex at that point in your life as that's a signal that you need to get your life straightened.

When your life is straight, sex will find you by itself.
Do you think someone like Portable has any game or waste his time learning game?

Melagros:
COMRADES, we don't suppose to be laughing or happy all the time, for the sake of our health, sometimes let's just cry even if nobody beats or provokes us
Thank you

1. I've ed the age that I can shed tears.
2. I've been thru many bullshits in life that my feelings
are kind of turned off.
3. Even if I wanted to pretend to be crying, I'd end up
laughing at myself because I know it's impossible.

RealityKings1:



There is only one God

Which is?

Lol! You need to be specific so that we can know which God you are talking about.
The God of the Bible, The one from Qur'an or who gangan?

Abba3point7:
U believe a shite called AI but u can't believe the holy book and you think you are smart nawa for u oo

I'm failing to understand what makes the bible holy

DrManHattan1:

I am very glad the way you respond and advice me bro and i will take ur advice by God grace. Though to be honest living without a woman is very difficult i wil try to have something that wil distract my attention

How is living without a woman very difficult?
😂
My dear son, living with woman is extremely difficult.

haybhi1:
Good. But how do you get sex?

I'm sorry but I really don't understand your question.
It's like asking how do you get food?
Sex is easier to get than companionship.
It is very easy to get sex than to even get a girlfriend.
Just have a place to have sex, though you may not get the 7-10 girls but you'll definitely get the 4,5,6 girls.
I read a particular book one time like that that changed my perspective about the female personality.
Do you even know that girls want sex more than boys. If a woman liked you so much, the first thing she'll give to you is sex.
When some men are struggling to get sex, some men are running from it.

And by the way, sex is overrated. There is no big deal. There is no award for a man who has the highest sex partners, focus on other important things.

I wrote something about this 2 years ago.
You see, man and women are too different to live together long term.
And love is an illusion, not necessarily a scam.
It is something that you thought was there, but it is not what we thought it was.
Love is a chemical reaction that wears off with time.
Love is a feeling, no human relationship can sustain on feelings.
The same way people recover from sickness is the same way people recover from feelings.

A contract marriage will by far last longer than a marriage based on the so called "Love marriage".

I've not been in a relationship for a very very very long time. And the reason is because, since I went celibate, I have no reason for a woman in my life. I am emotionally independent, I don't need companionship.
There are too many books in this world to read, when I'm done reading all of them, which i cant. I'll need a companionship then.

Viccur:
Ours is British English not American's. That word is wrong. Could be correct in American English.

The fact remains that "practicalize" is used both in US and in Britain.
Practicalise is the misspelt version.

Viccur:
Practicalise

Very common word, even lecturers and Profs say it.

What are you saying?
Practicalise is very much correct. The US version is practicalize

chatinent:



Actually, those views, likes, shares and followers reveal a lot about the mentality of people we live together with in this world.


More like watching Shanks Comedy or saying Sabinus is funnier than Layi Wasabi.

There's nothing intelligently funny about Sabinus' contents, nor Shanks, nor Egungun, nor their ilks. How do you even sit to watch Ghenghen! How do you get comfortable watching those scripted nonsense from Untouchable, Ogas Amos etc! Like what the fck went wrong with the occipital/temporal lobe, thalamus, and cerebellum in their heads!

If I just see someone watching Untouchable comedy, knowing fully well you are aware it is staged, uncreative, badly presented and uneducative, yet you are laughing uncontrollably, my god!, omo, we can never be friends!

And people with the same mentality I speak of will run and type "bad belle, do your own." Omo! Are you really expecting I respond to you? Omo, sorry o.

Layi Wasabi creates very intelligent jokes, with the aesthetics of pun, legal advice for free, and unveils societal gbasgbos in the country.

Don't get me wrong, I am no killjoy..a little of nonsense contents isn't too bad for the brain but don't make it customary! For example, I can watch Rukky when bored too.., or Codm clips.

Go and view Layi Wasabi's followerbase and compare with Sabinus, Shanks, Untouchable etc. Now tell me how you expect a country with so much daft people to be able to invent sth as small as a toothpick, or even a dental flux when all they do is keep leaving their brain gears in reverse.

I mean, does not their brain have the 'skip' instincts!

It's all about mentality tho.

I don't know whether I'm weird though, but I don't watch skits and all the comedians be looking like idiots to me.

Maynman:
Flawed.

😂😂😂

SIRTee15:


Your analogy is weak because I don't live in your house to know if U have a unicorn or not. I can only made decision based on what U tell me.

We both live in this world and dwell in it. Nothing I have access to is denied for U. We both exist in the same space.

Evidence that made me conclude there's a God is equally accessible to U.

Anyway, Let me ask U a question.
Before mount Everest was discovered, what was the tallest mountain in the world?

Mr! The analogy is not weak. Both a unicorn and a supposed son of God are things that do not have any form of interaction and observation with humans.

They both are things that are not ordinary. Y'all claim a man who supposedly died about some two thousand years ago is alive and living.

I said okay. Show us the evidence that the man is truly an offspring of a supposed God and by extension that he is still alive.

You answered and asked me to show you the evidence that he is not the son of God, and by extension that he is not alive.

Now, you yourself. Sit down and think about what you just said.

The evidence that anyone who dies is no longer alive is everywhere. Do you know the greatest evidence? It is non-interaction.
The greatest evidence for the non existence of every human being is non-interaction.
They don't breathe and they don't interact with any other human being.

If you're asking me to present the evidence that Jesus is not the son of a God. Then I present to you that, though you argued that he lived. I tell you that he is not alive and by extension he is not a son of a suppose God.

Do you now agree that I have a unicorn at my house or not?

HellVictorinho9:


Y are you convinced that the universe exists without avin sumtin b4 it, thatz what he is saying,



I think both of you are confused.

Well, we've not said anything about the universe.
Please follow the flow of engagement.

Right about now we are at the existence of Jesus.
Let's maintain that point.

SIRTee15:


The biggest headache I have with layman atheist is they don't know how to argue.

You came here and said U rejected the bible because it said Jesus is the son of God.

Is this now what U wrote...

If you said Jesus was a normal human being and not a special son of God and not alive. It would have been better. We could say, fine. He went down in history like any other.

But saying he is a son of God and that he is one special thing is nothing but a joke.

When I asked for evidence of why U rejected Jesus as Son of God, U started ranting about metaphysics

What does metaphysics and quantum physics has to do with a statement in the bible?

Next time just say U don't believe in the bible because it's content contradict the law of physics or Yahweh doesn't exist. Simple and spare us all the unnecessary headache.

If U don't believe God exist, we shouldn't be talking about the bible at all.

That's what we call external evidence!!!!
Do U get it now.

I don't think I want to take U on metaphysics because my experience with atheists is they don't understand metaphysics in the first place.
Atheist contradict themselves so much when it comes to metaphysics. They just like throwing fancy and big words around to sound intelligent; terminologies they themselves do t understand

And what U wrote up there s my assertion.

You wrote Jesus can't be Son of God because U believe there's no existence of God in the first place. And since Jesus can't be come out of nothing, then Jesus being son of Yahweh is a lie meaning Jesus saying he's the son of a non existent thing makes no sense.
This argument is related to the law of infinite regress which brings us to law of cause and contingency.

Now here is the problem.

Atheist will want to us to believe that our universe and every existence we know came out of nothing.
Matter, mass and time that comprise the universe came into existence out of nothing.

To atheist the law of infinite regress makes sense when it comes to the universe and our existence- we don't need a first cause to exist.
But when it comes to Jesus being the Son of God- suddenly law of infinite regress no longer makes sense and there has to be a cause.

According to atheist, for Jesus to be Son of Yahweh, the principle of 'necessary being' must be applied- Jesus must come from a cause. But when it comes to the universe, the principle of contingency thing should be rejected- universe can exist without a cause.

Above is a clear contradiction. And that's why debating atheist on metaphysics is a waste of time.

Stop it now! What are you saying?

If I said I've got a unicorn right in my house. And you say I do not have. And I ask you to give me a proof that I do not have the unicorn.

That only means that I'm demented and deranged.
Because, even a primary school kid knows that the burden of proof rests on the shoulders
of whoever claims the existence of stuff.

Have you seen why I said this discourse is intellectually depleting?

Sultty:
you guys should stop derailing this thread and put your opinion on baltasar ebang egonga related threads. It's not hard to do, try to at least congratulate this couple. Btw did the op complained to you on the paternity of his kids?? Busy body people

Na me tell am make e go run DNA?

debbydams:
coming from a man abi na boy who is begging a gurl to date him...

Wishful thinking

princepee:
I swear mad people full this platform.
For your mental health, don't bring your issues to nairaland.
If this man is not strong he may start doubting his wife.

A man who does not doubt a woman is a weak and a finished man

SIRTee15:


So U just woke up one morning and concluded Jesus isn't the Son of God?

My question is clear. What evidence do U have both internal and external that made u conclude what is written in the bible is false.

It's not a difficult question to answer. If U are an intelligent and diligent atheist as U claim.

A person of my reputation should not indulge this kind of intellectual depleting discourse.

In my own opinion. The most thoughtless question to ask is "what evidence do I have that Jesus is not the son of God?"
Like, there is no evidence that Jesus was the son of God to begin with. There is no evidence for Yahweh himself, who is the supposed father.

There is something called the consistency paradox or the grandfather paradox under the concept of time traveling and parallel universe in quantum physics.

To put it very shortly. An offspring cannot exist without the parent.
Jesus cannot exist without Yahweh. The whole existence of Jesus rests on the existence of Yahweh. But there is no evidence of the existence of Yahweh himself. Hence the consistency paradox.

Have you seen why I said I shouldn't waste my time on such IQ depleting discourse?

I'm sorry, but if that's the best you could do. You need to up your game.

SIRTee15:


Ok let me explain how historical evidence work.
Now how do historians gather evidence from history ? They research ancient documents looking for evidence for or against historical claim.
Now this could either be internal or external evidence.

Internal evidence is what is in the documents that or refute the claim.
External evidence is what is outside of the documents that or refute the content in the document.

The bible is a historical document. If U are saying the bible is false. Then what in the bible led credence to your assertion and what have U discovered outside of the bible that debunks what's written in the bible.

U said U don't believe Jesus is the Son of God as stated in the bible.
What evidence do U have either internal or external evidence to back your claim that the statement is false.
Are U saying Jesus never called himself Son of God, or he did but was lying or he did but not as Christians meant it to be or the gospel writers just made it all up.

Lol! Child's play. Na you go tell me how historical evidence works? 😂

This is not a kind of discussion I should waste my precious time on.
Lol! I expected you to do better. What evidence do I have that Jesus is not the son of God? Really? 😂 😂

SIRTee15:


1. My friend that's not how history works. What evidence do U have that people like Aristotle, Socrates or Nefertiti ever existed.
How do U know Julius Caesar or Alexander the great ever existed and not just some made up figure.
My guy, the only evidence we have about them is what their own people wrote about them. We looked into historical records and analysed as well as filter thru what their people wrote about them. That's how we know what's real and what's made up.

Historical documents are pieces of evidence and historians treat them as such.

U don't travel to China to learn about Nerfetiti, instead u look for what ancient Egyptians wrote about her.

U also don't travel to Rome to learn about Orunmila. Instead U study the oral tradition and history of Yoruba people to understand if Orunmila is a real person or not.
Do U get it now.

2. That mean U never did any critical thinking of your own while U were a Christian? Is that what U saying?

1. We can't compare Aristotle and Socrates to a said son of God. It doesn't add up.
The thing is. Aristotle and likes we're normal human being like us.
They were dead and no longer alive.

If you said Jesus was a normal human being and not a special son of God and not alive. It would have been better. We could say, fine. He went down in history like any other.

But saying he is a son of God and that he is one special thing is nothing but a joke.

2. My personal conviction was rooted in a disorder called delusion.

SIRTee15:



1. The biggest question is what evidence do we have from the bible that proves the God of the bible is the supreme God.

2. So when U were a Christian what made u think this God I worship written about in the bible is the ONLY TRUE GOD.

1. First of all, the evidence for the existence of Spiderman in real life cannot be found in the comics. If we wanted to believe Spiderman is real, we need a real life proof.
*****
___Second of all. That evidence you are talking about. Please state it and let's go thru it together.

2. Good. Number 1. Childhood indoctrination, Appeal To Authority, ad populum fallacy and delusional disorder , a priori fallacy wishful thinking , and appeal to fear fallacy.

It was that crazy

MaxInDHouse:

Let's read what transpired between Jesus and one of his disciples on this topic:
Then Peter said in reply: “Look! We have left all things and followed you; what, then, will there be for us?” Matthew 19:27

In other words "if we dedicate our lives to doing what you taught us, is there anything we will have that others are missing?"

Jesus responded:
“Truly I say to you, no one has left house or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields for my sake and for the sake of the good news who will not get 100 times more now in this period of time—houses, brothers, sisters, mothers, children, and fields, with persecutions—and in the coming system of things, everlasting life. Mark 10:29-30

So as one of those preaching and teaching people around me the Good News of God's Kingdom i'm going to loose friends, brothers, sisters, elderly ones who supposed to be like fathers and mothers to me and some job opportunities that doesn't go well with my faith. But then i will have 100 times friends, brothers, sisters, elderly ones who will be like fathers and mothers to me and job opportunities that will make me happier than all my mates.
Surely i will be persecuted for sticking to my faith but instead of relying on friends and families who are numbered but then they will be replaced with millions of friends and families in the faith who are waiting to welcome me home throughout the globe because i am a member of the same faith!
Nobody can enjoy such blessings if he is not one of Jesus' disciples that's why many are puzzled and after seeing the LOVE permeating the gathering of true believers knowing fully well that we don't know ourselves other than the faith that unite us {John 13:34-35} they conclude that we are cultists! Matthew 10:24-25



Jesus has helped me to know the real cause of hatred and killings going on in the world around me {John 8:44} so when unbelievers are fighting and killing their neighbors my brothers and i are going to visit them in their homes to reason with them that there is no sense in hating our neighbors who are not our race. Mark 12:31

Honestly, I'm failing to understand your point.

Please list few things that you or any christian have that cannot be found in the lives of others.

MightySparrow:



👏

What then is the meaning of atheism?

What do you think it is?

SIRTee15:


I think I read somewhere that U were an altar boy in catholic b4 becoming atheist.
I've always said it, those who leave Christianity do so because they don't understand the faith. No true Christian who understands the bible will ever leave.
These ex Christians simply make erroneous assumptions from the bible which unfortunately becomes their reality. Then they make ignorant decisions based on these falsehoods.

And to be sincere, I don't blame them. The church has taken too many things for granted in the last few decades without checking if the are on the same page with the pulpit.
The bible says work out your salvation with fear and trembling, unfortunately today's church has failed to guarantee it's own salvation.
The are seeing this and are beginning to question the faith.
I myself had my own challenge reconciling my belief with the message coming from the pulpit and at a time I began to drift away. That was until I began to study the bible myself and research the theology within it.
The revelation from the bible is clear- it's impossible for the bible to be false. It's impossible for the message coming from the bible to be made up.

If U actually take time to study and research the theology of Christianity, U can only come to one conclusion. The God of the Bible is the only true God.

I can take U on this journey so long as U have an open mind and willing to learn new things.
I I debated one of U agnostic here called Nonethnicity or something like that. By the time I disconnected his claims from reality, he couldn't continue because he was stuck.

After i left Catholic. I had to worship with different denominations because I traveled alot, only white garment churches I didn't.

I was 9 when I got my first Bible and before I reached 25 I had already read the Bible from Matthew to revelation more than forty times and the old testament more than 9 times words for words.
Therefore, there is nothing you can tell me about the Bible that I prolly don't know.

However, in order not to sound arrogant. Please bring it on

Fiscus105:



Atheist online, Sunday school teacher offline.

Anyway, everyone is doing something that would just make him/her happy.

Not easy to find joy during Tinubu reign Jor.

Christian in daylight . Babalawo's house at night.

Everyone is free to catch cruise during this Tinubu era

RomanceMoney:
Una Say Una Want "Sex Before Marriage", But Na Una Still Want Marry Virgin

Make everybody marry who deflowered them.
As simple as ABC

Sp1ritHusband:
I dont forgive. It's only weak people that forgive.

You have only one chance to cross me, I only give a second chance to family like siblings.

At least we both agreed here, unlike how we disagreed on the other thread