NewStats: 3,264,215 , 8,182,987 topics. Date: Tuesday, 10 June 2025 at 08:09 AM 552c3o

ovieigho:


Lol,you are clever by half? Usa has never been into war with any country in recent years... They were searching for taliban in the midst of innocent people and decorum is needed! If it's a full scale war like your putin has embarked on since over 4yrs without winning then believe me Afghanistan won't take a day before they are leveled


U can't be in a war with a country and still protect it's citizens

.

See you , tell the USA to declare a ' a no fly zone ' in Ukraine like they did in Libya if they are not afraid of Russia. Declare a no fly zone and begin to take down Russia jets from the air and let's see what follows. They were quick to declare a no fly zone in Libya that was fighting mere civil war but couldn't declare same when Russia ' unjustly ' invaded Ukraine.

WritterNg:


He's right.

Russia is the largest country on earth. No army on earth can cover an area that size. Not even 80 million troops. The US can barely mobilize 2 million troops.

Russia has the largest mineral reserves on earth. Rare earth metals and others in abundance.

Russia has the largest missile arsenal on earth. And the largest and most diverse nuclear arsenal.

Russia is backed by China & India and the rest of Asia (4 billion people). All nuclear armed btw.

So how on earth do you expect the US to win against Russia? Even with the help of NATO.

Who goes are invading bushes, attack cities with drones and missiles, giving Ukraine advance weapons to strike into Russia will cause Russia lots of damage, imagine Finland, Sweden and Poland Russia's neigbbor ing the fight will be very brutal. If you add some NATO countries like , and Turkey, it's a done deal. While the US provide them with intels, Russia won't survive 2 weeks of massive bombardment.

lexy2014:


Tnx but how does that answer what I asked.

1. how is NATO using Ukraine as a pawn?

2. when did NATO start using Ukraine as a pawn?

3. what is Russia trying to achieve by attacking Ukraine?

Maybe you have not been following the war. Who are those supplying Ukraine with all the weapons and money to fight the war? US alone has spent over 150bn dollars on this war , in weapons and medicine, the Europeans allies has equally made huge supplies ,yet Russia remains unscathed . Their intention for this war was to use it wear down Russia in order for them to attack and finish off Russia. This was to alloy them a monopoly of power to control the world. But instead of Russia, it is the west that is crying of depleted arsenal.

Salowise:

Who goes are invading bushes, attack cities with drones and missiles, giving Ukraine advance weapons to strike into Russia will cause Russia lots of damage, imagine Finland, Sweden and Poland Russia's neigbbor ing the fight will be very brutal. If you add some NATO countries like , and Turkey, it's a done deal. While the US provide them with intels, Russia won't survive 2 weeks of massive bombardment.

Go check, among the NATO nations only about two have ready army. The do called NATO are already complaining of depleting arsenal. You not following this war at all.

iwadobo:


Maybe you have not been following the war. Who are those supplying Ukraine with all the weapons and money to fight the war? US alone has spent over 150bn dollars on this war , in weapons and medicine, the Europeans allies has equally made huge supplies ,yet Russia remains unscathed . Their intention for this war was to use it wear down Russia in order for them to attack and finish off Russia. This was to alloy them a monopoly of power to control the world. But instead of Russia, it is the west that is crying of depleted arsenal.

Do you understand the questios I asked?

1. how is NATO using Ukraine as a pawn?

2. when did NATO start using Ukraine as a pawn?

3. what is Russia trying to achieve by attacking Ukraine?

Salowise:

Who goes are invading bushes, attack cities with drones and missiles, giving Ukraine advance weapons to strike into Russia will cause Russia lots of damage, imagine Finland, Sweden and Poland Russia's neigbbor ing the fight will be very brutal. If you add some NATO countries like , and Turkey, it's a done deal. While the US provide them with intels, Russia won't survive 2 weeks of massive bombardment.

k

ovieigho:


Lol,you are clever by half? Usa has never been into war with any country in recent years... They were searching for taliban in the midst of innocent people and decorum is needed! If it's a full scale war like your putin has embarked on since over 4yrs without winning then believe me Afghanistan won't take a day before they are leveled


U can't be in a war with a country and still protect it's citizens

Full scale war with only 195k troops? That was what Russia deployed to fight Ukraine.

How many troops did the US use to invade Afghanistan again? Over 500k troops including NATO troops.

Please let them stick to fighting ragtag Houthis, that's what their army is good for.

Salowise:

Who goes are invading bushes, attack cities with drones and missiles, giving Ukraine advance weapons to strike into Russia will cause Russia lots of damage, imagine Finland, Sweden and Poland Russia's neigbbor ing the fight will be very brutal. If you add some NATO countries like , and Turkey, it's a done deal. While the US provide them with intels, Russia won't survive 2 weeks of massive bombardment.

You are definitely not following the war up. You have certainly not read about what the Islander M - ballistic missiles is doing in Ukraine. No NATO made air defence system can take it down. The

overload during manoeuvring considerably exceeds the overload that most NATO-made anti-aircraft missiles can endure. Therefore, the Ukrainian army has no capabilities to shoot down Iskanders.

The adversary can only observe the flight of these missiles and realise the inevitable destruction of its sites," the firm stated.

You don't know Russia, they are destroying all NATO made anti aircraft defense system in Ukraine on daily basis. NATO really want test Russia's might through Ukraine and Russia is ready to show them what it has got.

Lies. Puttin no go say that. People just de try to stear a show down.


people think say war go be between trump and puttin. no.just as he is not dieing yet in the ukrain war, Thatis how it will be in world war. Other people will be doing the dieing.


Until leaders actually lead wars, war will never end. See how brave puttin has been..he will cry like a bitchhh . We all saw sadam hussein in his later yrs looking like a wet rat.

when their execution will come, many of them that act hard in wars because others are doing their dieing become cowards and weakling.. Even the frontline sodier will end up showing more courage than so called generals.

lexy2014:


Do you understand the questios I asked?

1. how is NATO using Ukraine as a pawn?

2. when did NATO start using Ukraine as a pawn?

3. what is Russia trying to achieve by attacking Ukraine?

You asked how and I told you how . Fighting Russia through Ukraine. What does that mean to you ? Maybe you have issue with semantics.

WritterNg:



Full scale war with only 195k troops? That was what Russia deployed to fight Ukraine.

How many troops did the US use to invade Afghanistan again? Over 500k troops including NATO troops.

Please let them stick to fighting ragtag Houthis, that's what their army is good for.

war in the air
Russia is raining hellfire on Ukraine
New attacks push its air defences to saturation point

tunary:
Putin is an oppressor and he wants to gets the land with full force, it's obvious no one can make him change his mind. This is the man alot of people prefer to US president.

Russians and Chinese and both very wicked just like that short fat man in North Korea

The people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam,Libya, Yugoslavia disagree with you

WritterNg:


Just to beat ragtag Taliban in Afghanistan, the US needed help from all 30 NATO , including some gulf states. Afghanistan, the poorest country in the world without any or backing like Ukraine.

And guess what? They still lost after fighting for 20 years with $4 trillion wasted.

Shebi Iran, North Korea = 30 countries??

The US doesn't live on same continent with Afghanistan so for such a distant war they can use Nato forces. Russia is next door to Ukraine. Lol

runningriot:
Ok let me unequivocally state how the US will win Russia with all the aforementioned that you said because overtime there is a transitional process in war from conventional to unconventional. Firstly, war is not fought and won on the tenets of population if not the recent outburst between India and Pakistan the 6 days war between Israel and her Arab nation wouldn't have happened rather is fought and won through intelligent gathering, logistics, technology and etal. Secondly, having abundant rare earth minerals does not translate to winning wars if not we would have Russia winning Ukraine in the war as mentioned by Putin to end in two weeks then the dumb of all is land mass! Prior to this time China was conquered by Japan Nigeria threatened to invade Niger which would have happened like ABC alone during Adolf Hitler invaded almost all her neighboring countries which if they are put together is thrice the size of his country. So bro it is highly inconsequential to say war is warn through rare earth minerals, population or land mass. Modern warfare is won through intelligence gathering, logistics, espionage, technology and the power of projection from land, air and sea! I hope you are convinced beyond reasonable doubt with proper and in-depth analysis free from biasness rather base on objectivity and transcend of events that has neutralized and liquidated your submission that US can't win Russia in a war!

In a direct war between the USA and Russia, there would be no true winner. Both nations would likely resort to using their nuclear arsenals—not as a showpiece, but as a response to feeling gravely threatened. These weapons weren’t stockpiled for decoration; they were meant for moments of extreme crisis. In such a scenario, there wouldn’t be victors—only devastation on all sides.

WritterNg:


Incapable?? For a war that is barely 3 years old? Ukraine is the second largest country in Europe after Russia. Ukraine had the second largest ground army in Europe after Russia, before the war. Ukraine had more weapons than before the war.

Ukraine has received over $450 billion in weapons, that's more than 100 countries GDP.

The Ukrainian regions that caused the war are already under Russian control. Together with 70% of Ukrainian mineral resources and rare earth metals.

The US took 20 years and $4 trillion to fight a ragtag Taliban group only to lose to them. The poorest nation on earth. Did the Taliban receive the same as Ukraine is receiving? In fact it was the reverse. The US was ed by the whole NATO countries.

No Russian official has ever said the war will be won in a short time. Infact Putin has said so many times that they're prepared to fight forever, if that's what It'll take. Prove me wrong and show us links.

Russia fought Sweden for 21 years and captured territories. St Petersburg of today's Russia is one of those territories.

The difference between Russia and the U.S is that when the Russians capture any territory, it is lost forever. No force on earth can return it back.

That has always been their history. That's how Russia got bigger in the first place.

I hope you're aware that the same "ragtag Taliban" defeated the Soviet and forcefully chased them out of Afghanistan in the 80s??
Go and research about the Mujahideen battle with the Soviets

Tjra:

What would you do if you were the President of the US?

Keep fueling the fight? Keep sanctioning Russia? Wait.. Has either worked so far?

See, Ukraine and NATO can never defeat Russia. Not even in the next 100 years.

US itself CANNOT win an all out war against Russia.

If asslicking the ass of Putin is what would end the war, then it's a fair deal.

same Russia that Ukraine chased out of all their major cities? They ran, leaving their weapons and tanks behind. If Harris were president you would have been hearing Putin threatening to launch nukes everyday after getting beat up by Zelensky. Trump is an insane slowpoke and a coward, he's the one giving Russia mind

WritterNg:


He's right.

Russia is the largest country on earth. No army on earth can cover an area that size. Not even 80 million troops. The US can barely mobilize 2 million troops.

Russia has the largest mineral reserves on earth. Rare earth metals and others in abundance.

Russia has the largest missile arsenal on earth. And the largest and most diverse nuclear arsenal.

Russia is backed by China & India and the rest of Asia (4 billion people). All nuclear armed btw.

So how on earth do you expect the US to win against Russia? Even with the help of NATO.

Nobody is invading the frozen wasteland

Give Zelensky long range missiles to destroy all Russian oil and gas installations and other vital infrastructure. That's the only way to bring Putin to the negotiating table to end the war.

JagabanBorgu:

U all think war is a straight line until it starts, if could run through Europe during world war II and it took a huge coalition spending blood and sweat to stop them.
Don't think this will be different, China will mostly likely team up with Russia, same as Iran and a few others, this will be more terrible than what the Germans, Japanese and Italians did during world war II.
Those in power knows this, that's why they are not outrightly àttàcking Russia.

China cannot go to war because Russia is attacked directly by US and EUROPE, you can say Iran and North Korea. China love their economy, they can only go to war to seize Taiwan, that's their only interest.

WritterNg:


He's right.

Russia is the largest country on earth. No army on earth can cover an area that size. Not even 80 million troops. The US can barely mobilize 2 million troops.

Russia has the largest mineral reserves on earth. Rare earth metals and others in abundance.

Russia has the largest missile arsenal on earth. And the largest and most diverse nuclear arsenal.

Russia is backed by China & India and the rest of Asia (4 billion people). All nuclear armed btw.

So how on earth do you expect the US to win against Russia? Even with the help of NATO.

Dem dey talk about Russia facing U.S alone you dey go bring china and India to body fight U.S😆😆
The way u dey reason sometimes enhh e dey weak me oo
Wetin concern how big Russia is with modern warfare? With dis ur Russia propaganda wey u dey spread for here everyday so, i hope dem dey pay you? If not na f-up be daht oo

WritterNg:


He's right.

Russia is the largest country on earth. No army on earth can cover an area that size. Not even 80 million troops. The US can barely mobilize 2 million troops.

Russia has the largest mineral reserves on earth. Rare earth metals and others in abundance.

Russia has the largest missile arsenal on earth. And the largest and most diverse nuclear arsenal.

Russia is backed by China & India and the rest of Asia (4 billion people). All nuclear armed btw.

So how on earth do you expect the US to win against Russia? Even with the help of NATO.

China will not mobilize it's army to fight for Russia if a war begins, neither will india, India is more dependent on America than on Russia and India also will not mobilize to fight for Russia, if NATO wants an all out war with Russia, Russia will be totally destroyed, Russia is powerful, but not that powerful as you make it to look.

iwadobo:


You asked how and I told you how . Fighting Russia through Ukraine. What does that mean to you ? Maybe you have issue with semantics.

in the questions I asked, can you show me where I asked you for semantics?

where in your response below did you answer the 3 questions I asked?

iwadobo:


Maybe you have not been following the war. Who are those supplying Ukraine with all the weapons and money to fight the war? US alone has spent over 150bn dollars on this war , in weapons and medicine, the Europeans allies has equally made huge supplies ,yet Russia remains unscathed . Their intention for this war was to use it wear down Russia in order for them to attack and finish off Russia. This was to alloy them a monopoly of power to control the world. But instead of Russia, it is the west that is crying of depleted arsenal.

Do you understand the questios I asked?

1. how is NATO using Ukraine as a pawn?

2. when did NATO start using Ukraine as a pawn?

3. what is Russia trying to achieve by attacking Ukraine?

Salowise:

Who goes are invading bushes, attack cities with drones and missiles, giving Ukraine advance weapons to strike into Russia will cause Russia lots of damage, imagine Finland, Sweden and Poland Russia's neigbbor ing the fight will be very brutal. If you add some NATO countries like , and Turkey, it's a done deal. While the US provide them with intels, Russia won't survive 2 weeks of massive bombardment.

Don't pray for world war. The world is already going through a lot economically for another world war to happen. Only president Zeleskey can stop this war but he's too arrogant to accept Putin's demands.

muyico:
Putin isn't Christian

He's actually an Atheist

9japride:
[color=#006600][/color]

Are you really serious? It's like saying one of those South American countries will defeat USA.
Russia is just being lenient with Ukraine in this war.
Those who want the war to continue have an agenda.

lol.. Lenient ke?? The only weapon left for them to use in that small Ukraine na nuclear weapons, they boasted about capturing Kiev after 48 hours, three years don , but somehow you think they can defeat nato, take away their nuclear weapons and nothing dey there

Watcharena:
The people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam,Libya, Yugoslavia disagree with you

these are Muslim nations and they are all very wicked just like Russia and China. Like Lucifer like abbadon

tunary:
these are Muslim nations and they are all very wicked just like Russia and China. Like Lucifer like abbadon

when did Vietnam, Yugoslavia become Muslim

xareal:
lol.. Lenient ke?? The only weapon left for them to use in that small Ukraine na nuclear weapons, they boasted about capturing Kiev after 48 hours, three years don , but somehow you think they can defeat nato, take away their nuclear weapons and nothing dey there

[color=#006600][/color]

I don't think Russia is using their full force on Ukraine. It's like a friendly war.
I believe the only time Russia might use force is if Ukraine attack the main cities of Russia.

Nicoddemus:


Are you indirectly ing Putin invading Ukraine?

Not likely, I'm just stating the obvious.

I'm an advocate of PEACE.

WritterNg:


Incapable?? For a war that is barely 3 years old? Ukraine is the second largest country in Europe after Russia. Ukraine had the second largest ground army in Europe after Russia, before the war. Ukraine had more weapons than before the war.

Ukraine has received over $450 billion in weapons, that's more than 100 countries GDP.

The Ukrainian regions that caused the war are already under Russian control. Together with 70% of Ukrainian mineral resources and rare earth metals.

The US took 20 years and $4 trillion to fight a ragtag Taliban group only to lose to them. The poorest nation on earth. Did the Taliban receive the same as Ukraine is receiving? In fact it was the reverse. The US was ed by the whole NATO countries.

No Russian official has ever said the war will be won in a short time. Infact Putin has said so many times that they're prepared to fight forever, if that's what It'll take. Prove me wrong and show us links.

Russia fought Sweden for 21 years and captured territories. St Petersburg of today's Russia is one of those territories.

The difference between Russia and the U.S is that when the Russians capture any territory, it is lost forever. No force on earth can return it back.

That has always been their history. That's how Russia got bigger in the first place.

What about East that the Soviet Union used to control?

Russian nah over hype country.... Just noise noise all the time